The proposal, which sought to address the urgent housing crisis in the capital, only received support from the PSOE. The Popular Party voted against it, while Coalición Canaria abstained, despite the governing group acknowledging a “structural problem” regarding housing in Santa Cruz de La Palma.
The groups that rejected the motion justified their stance by arguing that the only viable solution is to increase housing supply through new construction. This view was criticized by the socialist group's spokesperson, who called the position an “excuse for inaction.”
“"Building public housing is necessary, but it takes years. Declaring a stressed area is a tool to act today, without having to wait for new developments to be planned, tendered, and built, which will take legislative terms to arrive."
The Socialist Group has directed its criticism mainly towards the Popular Party, accusing it of prioritizing its “ideological dogmatism” over the real needs of citizens. They also lamented Coalición Canaria's abstention, considering it a “low profile” stance in the face of a serious social drama.
The Socialist Group has reiterated its commitment to continue demanding that housing be a real priority, and not just an electoral promise, despite being alone in the Plenary vote.
