The proposal, promoted by a senator from the Gomera Socialist Group (ASG), highlights the need for a differentiated approach for the archipelago, given its external energy dependence, territorial fragmentation, and the unique aspects of its Economic and Fiscal Regime (REF).
“"The Archipelago cannot face this energy crisis with the same tools as continental territories."
The motion proposes various measures, such as ensuring that the REF does not hinder access to state aid, strengthening coordination between the central Government and the Autonomous Community, and updating freight transport compensation to reflect real costs. It also seeks to reinforce support for the primary sector through the POSEI program.
Furthermore, emphasis was placed on the importance of implementing specific actions for the non-capital islands, such as La Palma, La Gomera, and El Hierro, to correct their structural disadvantages and encourage population retention. It was argued that territorial cohesion cannot be achieved by ignoring regions with greater difficulties.
“"Without aviation fuel, there are no flights, and without flights, the Canary Islands are isolated."
The senator also requested flexibility in the spending rule to allow Canary Islands administrations to implement effective counter-cyclical policies, warning that current fiscal limitations hinder the response to the crisis. Additionally, the senator alerted to the risk the energy crisis poses to aviation fuel supply, a critical element for the Canary Islands, especially during the peak tourist season. A specific contingency plan was demanded to guarantee supply, strengthen logistics, diversify providers, and ensure stable energy corridors for the archipelago.
