The resolution from the municipal Urban Planning department comes after the court's decision, which is not yet final, dismissed an appeal filed by the developing company against a previous Town Council ruling. The earlier ruling had called for the restoration of urban legality in the area.
The situation originated from a police report and a local political party's complaint, which highlighted the demolition of enclosure walls on the first floor of the complex and their subsequent conversion into 37 homes without proper authorization.
Before the court ruled on the dispute, the developing entity had initiated procedures, via the PAMU, to regularize these houses. However, a report by the municipal architect had already warned about the ongoing judicial process and the need to assess its impact once the sentence was known. This assessment has led to the program's suspension.
“"The key lies in the fact that the company is not legitimate for the PAMU as it has not accredited ownership of the land it proposes to swap."




